Incomplete This is a Timeline but your prezi goes in a random sequence of bubble - it should be a line organised by time hence 'timeline' earliest left to latest right. Watch your spelling - fast pace There is no work here on Kuleshov or Eisenstein To improve: For a M you need to explain how one developed to another, and be specific about the techniques You need to explain the 5 types of montage
Week 10 - Modern NYA Despite the depth of examples on 2 lessons of lectures it is disappointing to see how little was captured Limited detail or reference to techniques and limited reference to influences there are no clips embedded for this period and the New Wave - you must cover to Pass: Purpose Techniques (specific reference and examples from films) Alternative techniques - discontinuity Development - what they did that effected the history of editing ie challenging Hollywood dominace
week 11: Contemporary Pass Descriptive and factual – minimal research/analysis done. Lacking detailed examples or discussion of purpose in Tarantino or Nolan’s work.
Incomplete
ReplyDeleteThis is a Timeline but your prezi goes in a random sequence of bubble - it should be a line organised by time hence 'timeline' earliest left to latest right.
Watch your spelling - fast pace
There is no work here on Kuleshov or Eisenstein
To improve:
For a M you need to explain how one developed to another, and be specific about the techniques
You need to explain the 5 types of montage
Continuity vs Montage?
ReplyDeleteWeek 10 - Modern
ReplyDeleteNYA
Despite the depth of examples on 2 lessons of lectures it is disappointing to see how little was captured
Limited detail or reference to techniques and limited reference to influences
there are no clips embedded for this period and the New Wave - you must cover to Pass:
Purpose
Techniques (specific reference and examples from films)
Alternative techniques - discontinuity
Development - what they did that effected the history of editing ie challenging Hollywood dominace
week 11: Contemporary
ReplyDeletePass
Descriptive and factual – minimal research/analysis done. Lacking detailed examples or discussion of purpose in Tarantino or Nolan’s work.